This post focuses on the earnings retention rate and its impact on growth. In many previous posts, we have discussed the concept of dividends and dividend policy. Dividends represent the portion of earnings that is available for distribution after the payment of all taxes and accounting for all net reinvestment in the business.
The idea for business owners is to get both sides of this balancing act right. It is good to reinvest for future growth. It is not good to reinvest in unproductive assets. This lowers expected returns and postpones current returns in the form of dividends.
If a business has productive reinvestment opportunities, it is good to try to grow through reinvestment. Reinvestment, as we see, lowers the potential for current returns in favor of future returns gained through growth.
Take your pick. Current returns or future returns or both. Your results will be determined by your earnings retention policy and the mirror dividend policy.
This post focuses on some of the potential analytical issues that may be appropriate for consideration, in addition to all of the normal issues in a typical valuation, when capitalizing EBITDA using the ACAPM.
The summer is sandwiched between Memorial Day, a day to remember those who died while serving in the armed forces of the United States, and Labor Day, a day dedicated to the social and economic achievements of American workers. I’ve always viewed Memorial Day as a time to reflect and to remember those who died […]
You say “hockey stick projections,” I now say “orthogonal projections.”
In a recent series of posts, we developed a means to develop direct and credible multiples of EBITDA applicable to specific valuation situations. This is important because EBITDA is part of the universal business language and is a term that appraisers, business owners and market participants understand. It is also important because until now, one way to capitalize EBITDA has been by using (often incomplete and/or dated) guideline transactions in other private or public companies. The other way has been through the use of guideline public companies, which may suffer in comparability based on size and many other differences.
Since writing the posts, I have had a number of opportunities to discuss the methodology with other appraisers and with clients. These conversations have encouraged me to write this single post to summarize this “new” method. In this post, we lay out the methodology for capitalizing EBITDA using the Adjusted CAPM in one place.
In 2012, I wrote a post on my former blog, Valuation Speak, titles Zynga and the High Cost of Concentrations. In that post, I talked about two key concentrations that were causing its stock price to be battered. The first had to do with a concentration in revenue in two games, Farmville and Mafia Wars. […]
Last week, I received an email from Janet, a recurring client asking to have a discussion with me about the value of recurring revenue. The question was interesting and stimulating and, I believe, of interest to many readers of this blog. This is a “first look” at recurring revenue. I plan to take at least a couple of other looks in the near future.
Buy-sell agreements are critical corporate documents. I’ve said that many times and in three books on the topic. This post is about a case in which the parties did not have a buy-sell agreement. They were involved in litigation over the buyout of one 50% owner (not in management) by the other (in management). There was a trial and, following the trial, a private settlement. I was involved in the case and so now am providing an analysis of the case.
New York’s Largest Corporate Dissolution | AriZona Iced Tea
Buy-sell agreements are critical corporate documents. I’ve said that many times and in three books on the topic. This post is about a case in which the parties did not have a buy-sell agreement. They were involved in litigation over the buyout of one 50% owner (not in management) by the other (in management). There was a trial and, following the trial, a private settlement. I was involved in the case and so now am providing an analysis of the case. The text of the analysis begins:
After several years of litigation involving a number of hearings and trials on various issues, a trial to conclude the collective fair value of a group of related companies known as the AriZona Entities occurred.
The Court’s decision in the AriZona matter was filed on October 14, 2014. I have not written about the AriZona matter because I was a business valuation expert witness on behalf of one side. The parties recently closed a private settlement of the matter, so there will be no appeal.
View Analysis of Case >
With oil prices dropping briefly below $40 per barrel on Friday (August 21, 2015) and the stock market dropping sharply in the recent past, investors in the public markets are being advised not to panic. The headline for the front page of the Saturday/Sunday Edition of The Wall Street Journal (August 22-23, 2015) reads “Stock Plunge Picks Up Speed.” In light of the circumstances, what happened to the value of closely held and family business in America over the last week?
